Well, to err is human. Haven't we all heard that before somewhere? The basic assumption is that once the person has "erred", he would not be castrated because no one is perfect & he would be making amends, lest he be a true fool. But what if the error you are making is part of your very nature ? What if you are accused of not being "interesting"? How do you make amends ? Well, being or not being "interesting" is a rather subjective question, but there might be certain universal qualities that might make a person immune to the allegation altogether, though not a 100% interesting person.
What constitutes an "interesting" person? Is the allegation leveled at me justified or is it just a case of subjectivity? I really want an answer, & maybe it's time i went out & got one.
0 comments:
Post a Comment